Review Methodology

A score is useful only if you know what went into it. Below are the sources, criteria, and limits behind our ratings.

Our sources

• Operator terms of service, sweepstakes rules and privacy policies.
• Published promotions pages and in-lobby promotional copy visible before sign-up.
• Operator help-center articles on redemptions, verification and responsible play.
• Publicly reported information about operator history and ownership, where available.

What we don't claim

These are document-based reviews. We do not claim account testing, purchases, measured redemption times, or independent licensing verification. A number supplied by an operator is described as advertised.

The five axes and weights

I. Bonus Value — 25%

Separates GC from SC, favors free claims over purchase-linked grants, and considers whether maximum-value headlines make the offer hard to assess.

II. Payout Terms — 25%

Considers published processing estimates, minimums, playthrough, available methods, and the clarity of identity-check instructions.

III. Game Library — 20%

Looks at the range of game types, original or exclusive titles, and visible catalog updates.

IV. Support — 15%

Examines contact options, stated service hours, and how well help articles answer practical questions.

V. Trust & Safety — 15%

Considers the public track record, ownership information, clarity of restrictions, and available tools for limits or self-exclusion.

From sub-scores to rating

Each category receives a score from 1 to 5, in tenths. We apply the published weights and round the total to one decimal. Trust & Safety breaks a tie.

Independence

Payment cannot buy a ranking change or remove criticism. We have no affiliate arrangements, and the site contains no casino referral links.

Corrections

Send the page and the detail you believe is wrong through our contact form. We review correction requests and revise the update date when an article changes.